Islam and Buddhism – Part 1.

There are different accounts of the life of the Buddha,  however I will present the main agreed details of his life. He was the son of a King, in what is believed to be modern day Nepal and was named Siddharta.  He grew up in luxury and comfort, ignorant to the realities of the harsh world that we live in. It is said that there were predictions that he would become a holy man and that his father in order to prevent this however this was in vain. One day he went outside of the palace that he had grown up in. Having been insulated from the real world he first of all saw a man afflicted by old age, heavily wrinkled and in poor health, then later whilst walking he saw an invalid and after that a funeral procession which clearly illustrated human mortality and that death is an unescapable reality we must deal with. He then however in the end met an ascetic. It is safe to call this term a Hindu ascetic, a point which I will focus on later. The ascetic impressed the young Siddharta who was troubled and heart broken by the suffering that he saw. The ascetic had a calmness, serenity and a happiness which could be felt. This ascetic had renounced the material world and was also a beggar. Siddharta, it is said that happiness could never be attained by living a normal life in the material world. Accounts vary but eventually Siddhartha left his palace including his wife and baby and took up ascetism.  He became what can be called a “monk”, a “holy man” or  an ascetic. There were many ascetics like him in South Asia or what is now called India and he did not create something new in that sense. He studied with different monks and gurus and engaged in extensive meditation, yogic practises and also heavy fasting. He did this for a number of years, but this did not give him the satisfaction, or the answer to his questions that he wanted. He gave this up and eventually ended up in Isipatana near the famous city of Benares on the Ganges. He rested and meditated under a Bo tree or “Bodhi tree”

Bodhi tree.

It was there that the boy who had grown up in a royal palace in great affluence, and then later on saw the nature of suffering finally found what he had been looking for after so many years. According to Buddhist tradition, Siddharta, attained enlightenment. The fundamental teachings of Buddhism came into existence.

The teachings of Buddhism.

There are different sects of Buddhism and a diversity of different beliefs and practises. However I will focus on the key message of Buddhism common to all sects.

The Four Noble Truths.

1. The first noble truth is called “dukkha”. Life is essentially suffering. Life will inevitably include aging, death and of course other painful things, none of these can be avoided.

2. The second noble truth is called “Samudaya” or “Tanha” (Craving or thirst). The cause of suffering is man’s desire for something. If he fails to get what he desires he thus becomes upset. Man looks outside to external things to guarantee happiness.  External things are all temporary and will perish, so we can never base true, permanent happiness on them as they too will go.

3. The next noble truth then is called “Nirodha”, (Stopping suffering) which means that there is a cure to ending suffering.  That cure is to liberate oneself from any form of desire.

So the first, second, and third noble truths diagnose what the problem is, explain the cause, and then says there is a cure. The fourth noble truth prescribes the cure.

4. The fourth noble truth is called “Marga”. It says that true happiness and meaning can be achieved by following a life based on the Noble eightfold path.

The Noble eightfold path.

1. Right understanding ( samma ditthi).

To view the world correctly and to realize its impermanent nature. That life essentially consists of much suffering e.g. aging, sickness and death. Also to understand that every action produces subsequent actions i.e. karma.

2. Right intention (samma sankappa).

To have a resolve to change and to live one’s life the correct way.

3. Right Speech (samma vaca).

To not lie, insult others and to abstain from excessive or idle talk.

4. Right Action (samma kammantha).

To stay away from a: harming others b: stealing and cheating c: To stay away from sexual wrongdoing, celibacy is the ideal in Buddhism.

5. Right livelihood (samma ajiva).

To earn one’s livelihood in a moral way and not to:

a: Earn money from selling weapons.

b: Make money from using people e.g. slavery and prostitution.

c: Deal in meat whether it be selling meat or raising animals to be used as meat.

d: Business in intoxicants and poisons including drugs and alcohol.

6.Right Effort (samma vayama).

To essentially strive to keep ones mind from impure and unhealthy thoughts and to have a morally healthy state of mind. The unhealthy thoughts are categorized into 5 and are called “pancanivarana” (5 hindrances) they are sensual desire for material pleasures, ill feelings towards others, drowsiness, worry and anxiety and doubt. These thoughts are said to hinder the path to enlightenment and liberation.

 7. Right mindfulness ( samma sati).

To be aware and attentive to one’s mind, body, feelings, and to things around us. This means to have a clearer and better perception of the reality of the world and also of our own lives, to be in the present and to be conscious and aware of them.

8. Right concentration ( samma samadhi).

To concentrate fully, to focus all of one’s mind and thinking on one object. This is why Buddhists engage in meditation.  Meditation is said to lead a person into a better understanding of his reality.

This eight-fold path eventually leads a person to true enlightenment, to true awareness of the reality of life, of the world. In other religions this process is called “gnosis”. Ultimately it is held in Buddhism that one can attain “Nirvana”, a state of pure happiness and bliss and when one is free from desire.

Islam and Buddhism.

Islam differs from Buddhism in many fundamentally different ways. The most fundamental difference is the nature of the way the two faiths look at the universe. Islam says that the universe has been created and Muslims cite to the evidences of intelligent design. Buddhism has no definitive answer on whether a creator exists but it is important to note that the 1967 world Buddhist council ruled out belief in God. This is the most important difference between the two since any person who is seeking the answers to the nature of existence would wish to have a fully comprehensive answer as to how the universe came in to being, what caused it to come in to being and why. Islam states that the supreme omnipotent entity who is God created the world and created man to worship him. To give an analogy if a man woke up in a strange land one day e.g. a valley and had no memory of his life before that day he would wish to know how he had come to the valley and what happened to him before then. For many people with no particular religion looking for the truth they want definitive answers to the nature of existence and creation and not a vague silence.

 Islam is far more a socio-economic faith whereas Buddhism is essentially a private faith. The Quran admonished the pagan Arabs for their mistreatment of orphans, infanticide of young girls, the inequality of their society, their corruption and cheating in business, their abuse of slaves and other forms of immoral behaviour. It confronted the existing social system of the time and called for it to be reformed. Buddha did not call for any great social changes but like many Hindu Gurus of today prescribed a way for individuals to gain personal spiritual satisfaction. Islam believes that a truly great man is not one who makes himself happy but is one who makes others happy. For a man to attain Enlightenment in the Buddhist way he must at first be free, to be free to leave normal society and follow the way of the Buddha. However this is impossible if for example the man is a slave.

 Spartacus was a famous slave in the Roman era who led a revolt against the Empire. For a man like Spartacus to have lived an ascetic lifestyle engaging in meditation he would have first have had to won his freedom.

Gladiators in the Roman period, many of whom were slaves forced to fight and kill each other. An individual ascetic trying to gain personal spiritual happiness by himself or with other mystics would not have had any impact on this barbaric practise.

 

 Spartacus, a Roman slave, who led a rebellion for freedom against slavery.

Buddhist monk in seclusion.

Serfs in Russia. Even as recently as around 150 years ago in eastern Europe, the vast majority of the Russian people were serfs akin to being rural slaves owned by their landlords.

Slavery is not just something of the past, only as recently as 140 years ago the majority of Russians for example were serfs i.e. in effect slaves to their landlords. In many third world countries, millions must work in miserable conditions in order to survive and have no choice. Child labour is also a phenomena in many countries. Such people do not have the choice to not work and try to be ascetics or monks, they are dependent upon great social reformers or campaigners to improve their plight. The prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) was one such social reformer who was divinely commanded to:

  1. Condemn the practice of female infanticide which existed amongst the pagan Arabs, this was in the form of them burying their young daughters alive.

When news is brought to one of them of the birth of a female child, his face darkens and he is filled with inward grief. With shame does he hide himself from his people because of the bad news he has had! Shall he retain her on contempt or bury her in the dust? Ah! what an evil they decide on?” (Quran 16:59).

The practise of infanticide is common even today in countries such as India where often for economic reasons the birth of a girl as opposed to a son who will be a bread-winner is seen by some as a misfortune. The Quran says:

” To Allah belongs the dominion of the heavens and the earth. He creates what He wills. He bestows female children to whomever He wills and bestows male children to whomever He wills” (Quran 42:49

 

God is the owner of the universe and creates all including wealth and one should not fear of poverty since as many Quranic verses remind us he is the one who gives provision and takes care of people. The prophet Muhammad peace be upon himself said:

“He who is involved in bringing up daughters, and accords benevolent treatment towards them, they will be protection for him against Hell-Fire”

2. Condemn the cheating of the pagan Arabs in their market places.

“Woe to those that deal in fraud. Those who, when they have to receive by measure from men, exact full measure, but when they have to give by measure or weight to men, give less than due. Do they not think that they will be called to account?-” (Quran 83:1-4)

3.  Condemn and eventually forbade the practise of usury which has contributed to many people being enslaved into a cycle of destitution.

“Allah will destroy Riba (usury) and will give increase for Sadaqah (deeds of charity, alms, etc.) And Allah likes not the disbelievers, sinners. ” (Quran 2: 276)

4. Prescribe the institution of zakat.

In Islam a Muslim is obliged to pay 2.5% of his wealth every year to certain types of poor people or in the Islamic state to the “bait ul mal” (public treasury) which then distributes it to poor people. It was this religious obligation and the institution of the baitul ul mal which was a huge and radical change at that time and was akin to the modern day practise of social support as it helped to alleviate and solve the problems of the poor and needy. Marxist scholars argue that religion is a tool to maintain the status quo and the power of the wealthy, however the practise of zakat obliged the rich to help those in poverty and it was a legal duty which if not carried out would entail punishment just like any other modern tax.

Zakat money could not be used to build public services such as roads or canals but could only be used for specific purposes e.g. to help the poor and needy.

“The charity is only for the poor, the needy, those employed to collect (the charity, i.e. zakah), those whose hearts will be inclined (towards Islam) for slaves,for those in debt, for the Cause of Allah, and for the wayfarer ( i.e. destitute travelerl). It is an obligation imposed by Allaah, and Allaah is the All-Knower, the All-Wise.”  (Quran 9:60)

Buddhism does not have specific measures on how to combat poverty. Buddha, though coming from a royal family and having at least some experiences of seeing rulership did not address leaders to state how they could improve the lives of their subjects but instead encouraged individual reform and renunciation of the world.

A truly great moral belief will inspire those who are stronger to help those who are weak and needy, and not to ignore them and try to attain personal spiritual happiness. For the weak and oppressed ones of this world can often not change their plight, but need those who are stronger to help them, or do it for them.

Hospitality and charity in Islam

In Islam, an economically strong Muslim is better than a poor Muslim. The one who has money is in a position to help others, to contribute to the betterment of society. A famous hadith of the prophet (peace be upon him) states: “The upper hand is better than the lower hand”, which means the one who gives is better than the one who receives. A Muslim should not seek to be a burden on others but an asset to others and making their lives better.

Whereas in Buddhism, monks, travel around collecting food from laymen in order to sustain themselves, in Islam the pious Muslim should be giving food to others and the more he gives the more virtuous.

Islamically, a Muslim has a duty to entertain a guest for 3 days i.e. to let him live in his house. So even before the current century in many parts of the Muslim world if a person went and travelled to another city he would know that he could stay in another person’s house for at least 3 days. The writer of this article was personally allowed to stay somewhere for 3 days when he travelled to Lebanon. This is where the celebrated hospitality in much of the Muslim world comes from.

There is a hadith.

My ears heard and my heart grasped (the statement which) the Prophet said, “The period for keeping one’s guest is three days (and don’t forget) his reward.” It was asked, “What is his reward?” He said, “In the first night and the day he should be given a high class quality of meals; and whoever believes in Allah and the Last Day, should entertain his guest generously; and whoever believes in Allah and the Last Day should talk what is good (sense) or keep quiet.” 

(Bukhari)

End of Part 1.

8 Responses to “Islam and Buddhism – Part 1.”


  1. 1 dougrogers November 29, 2009 at 8:42 pm

    “Islam says that the universe has been created … Buddhism has no definitive answer on whether a creator exists”

    Nope. This is an error. Buddhism says that trying to answer question of the creation of the universe is a distraction from the work of liberation. There is a rather obscure sutra where the Buddha expounds on the creation of things. Yes, there is no definitive answer as to whether a creator exists, and that’s because, in the Buddhist view, it is an irrelevant question and doesn’t help in actually solving the problem of Dukkha.

  2. 2 contoveros December 6, 2009 at 4:55 am

    Benjamin Franklin, one of the founders of the United States of America, said (and I paraphrase) that “fish and [house] guests stink after three days.”

    I wonder if he would agree with the 3-day visit rule you mention above. I would like to think that he would, and it is something that I will adopt and share with those I visit as well as friends who visit me.

    I feel “enlightened” with the history of Buddha. I am trying to learn his practice, and must admit I know next to nothing about his history. Your presentation has been the most thorough I have read.

    I agree with Islam that there is a God who is our Creator. I have problems with any Buddhist teaching that detracts from that. However, I would accept another name for the Supreme Being, if Buddhism can offer one.

    Perhaps there is a difference from the Buddhist “religion” and the Buddhist “tradition.” I would feel more comfortable in the “tradition” that accepts my belief in God.

    Thank you again for such a detailed comparison.

    Sincerely,

    Michael J Contos
    Conshohocken, PA of USA

  3. 3 dougrogers December 6, 2009 at 8:37 pm

    Michael, you can likely find a Buddhist practice that agrees with your beliefs. Most certainly you can find one which doesn’t detract from what you believe. The essential problem is names.

  4. 4 demithri April 24, 2010 at 7:00 am

    can’t accept any sort of compairs u commite to make comparing Buddhism above.

    I’m having only one Question to ask frm u first of all. How many Muslims do Blood wars among Muslims and other ppl in present world?? If God created Humans and animals and simply the nature, Y god let men to kill each other and animals who hv priority to live and have life as anyone? On one can say that animal deserve to eat by god or humans. If that so that animasl should hv come alone to be deserved saying ‘ hv me, I’m all ur’s to eat’.. No! if that animal going to heaven after sacrificing it’s fleash, then y anyone cannot kill their own chidren to make sacrifise and send them to the Heaven? If animals do then they too can go to the heaven na. Muslims purely Kill animals without any pitty and selflessly. that’s the truth!

    READ THE REST PLEASE.

    **********Lord Buddha didn’t released frm the question of birth of this universe without giving proper answer *********

    Buddhists believe that there are beings that inhabit the various celestial realms. These are variously called angels, spirits, gods and devas by various cultures. But do Buddhists believe that a God created everything and manipulate human lives? No, we do not. There are several reasons for this. Modern sociologists and psychologists, believed that religious ideas and especially the Creator-God idea have their origin in fear. The Buddha says:

    “Gripped by fear men go to the sacred mountains, sacred groves, sacred trees and shrines ~ Dhammapada 188”

    Primitive man found himself in a dangerous and hostile world, the fear of wild animals, of not being able to find enough food, of injury or disease, and of natural phenomena like thunder, lightning and volcanoes was constantly with him. Finding no security, he created the idea of a God that gives him comfort in good times, courage in times of danger and consolation when things went wrong. To this day, you will notice that people become more religious at times of crises, you will hear them say that the belief in a God gives them the strength they need to deal with life. You will hear them explain that they believe in a particular God because they prayed in time of need and their prayer was answered. All this supports the Buddha’s teaching that the God-idea is a response to fear and frustration. The Buddha taught us to try to understand our fears, to lessen our desires and to calmly and courageously accept the things we cannot change. He replaced fear, not with irrational belief but with rational understanding.

    The second reason the Buddhists do not believe in a Creator-God is because there does not seem to be any evidence to support this idea. There are numerous religions, all claiming that they alone have God’s words preserved in their holy book, that they alone understand God’s nature, that their God exists and that the Gods of other religions do not. Some claim that God is masculine, some that she is feminine and others that it is neuter. They are all satisfied that there is ample evidence to prove the existence of their God but they laugh in disbelief at the evidence other religions use to prove the existence of another God. For centuries, men have prayed to God for protection from war, from natural calamities and disease. Yet till today, these prayers remain unanswered. This is not surprising. Even less surprising is that so many different religions having spent so many centuries trying to prove the existence of their God there remains no real, substantial or irrefutable evidence.

    The third reason the Buddhists do not believe in a Creator-God is that the belief is not necessary. Some claim that the belief in a God is necessary in order to explain the origin on the universe. But this is not so. Science has very convincingly explained how the universe came into being without having to introduce the God-idea. Some claim that belief in God is necessary to have a happy, meaningful life. Again we can see that this is not so. There are millions of atheists and free-thinkers, not to mention many Buddhists, who live useful, happy and meaningful lives without belief in a God. Some claim that belief in God’s power is necessary because humans, being weak, do not have the strength to help themselves. Once again, the evidence indicates the opposite. One often hears of people who have overcome great disabilities and handicaps, enormous odds and difficulties, through their own inner resources, through their own efforts and without belief in a God. Some claim that God is necessary in order to give man salvation. But this argument only holds good if you accept the theological concept of salvation and there is no reason nor any other reasonable basis to accept such a concept. Based on his own experience, the Buddha saw that each human being had the capacity to purify the mind, develop infinite love and compassion and perfect understanding. He shifted attention from the heavens to the heart and encouraged us to find solutions to our problems through self-understanding.

    “He who has eyes can see the sickening sight, Why does not God set his creatures right?
    If his wide power no limit can restrain, Why is his hand so rarely spread to bless?
    Why are his creatures all condemned to pain? Why does he not to all give happiness?
    Why do fraud, lies, and ignorance prevail? Why triumphs falsehood — truth and justice fail?
    I count your God one among the unjust , who made a world in which to shelter wrong.” ~ Bhuridatta Jataka”

    But so many people believe in some form of a Creator, it must be true.

    Not so. There was a time when everyone believed that the world was flat, but they were all wrong. The number of people who believe in an idea is no measure of the truth or falsehood of that idea. The only way we can tell whether an idea is true or not is by looking at the facts and examining the evidence. If people continue to believe in God, they do so through faith, and faith is simply holding on to a belief when reason, logic and the evidence says otherwise.

    Each human being is precious and important, as all have the potential to develop the qualities of a Buddha – a perfected human being. Human beings can outgrow ignorance and irrationality and see things as they really are. Hatred, anger, spite and jealousy can be replaced by love, patience, generosity and kindness. All this is within the grasp of each person if they make the effort, are guided and supported by fellow Buddhists and inspired by the example of the Buddha.

    So if Buddhists do not believe in God, is it an atheistic religion?

    Buddhism is an atheistic religion only because it rejects the theistic and primitive concept of a Creator-God. The idea of God as a bearded old man looking down at us from the heavens and manipulating humans like in a puppet show appears ridiculous. Instead, Buddhists have as their highest ideal the state of Nirvana. The Buddha calls it the highest bliss. It is a state beyond all conceptual thought and is described by the Buddha as the Unborn, the Uncreated.

    “There is O monks, an Unborn, Unoriginated, Uncreated, Unformed. Were there not, o monks, this Unborn, Unoriginated, Uncreated, Unformed, there would be no escape from the world of the born, originated, created, formed. ~ Udana, 80-81”

    Buddhism teaches that the focus of our attention should not be an imaginary God and pointless speculation about what such a God did in the past and what he will do in the future. Instead, Buddhism is immensely more pragmatic. It teaches to focus our attention on ourselves, – to determine what is the cause of our sorrows and pain and to find a way to liberate ourselves from these. These teachings are encapsulated in the Four Noble Truths.

    A Buddhist should not be the aggressor even in protecting his religion or anything else. He must try his best to avoid any kind of violent act. Sometimes he may be forced to go to war by others who do not respect the concept of the brotherhood of man as taught by the Buddha. He may be called upon to defend his fellow men from aggression, and as long as he has not renounced the worldly life, he is duty-bound to join in the struggle for peace and freedom. Under these circumstances, he cannot be blamed for his action in becoming a soldier or being involved in defence. However, if everyone were to follow the advice of the Buddha, there would be no reason for war to take place in this world. It is the duty of every cultured man to find all possible ways and means to settle disputes in a peaceful manner, without declaring war to kill his fellow men. The Buddha did not teach His followers to surrender to any form of evil power, be it man or supernatural being.

    Indeed, with reason and science, man could conquer nature, and yet man has not yet even secured his own life. Why is it that life is in danger? While devoted to reason and being ruled by science, man has forgotten that he has a heart which has been neglected and has been left to wither and be polluted by passion.

    If we cannot secure our own lives, then how can world peace be possible? To obtain peace, we must train our minds to face facts. We must be objective and humble. We must realise that no one person, nor one nation is always wrong. To obtain peace, we must also share the richness of the earth, not necessarily with equality but at least with equity. There can never be absolute equality but surely there can be a greater degree of equity.

    It is simply inconceivable that five percent of the world’s population should enjoy fifty percent of the its wealth, or that twenty-five percent of the world should be fairly well-fed and some overfed, while seventy-five percent of the world is always hungry. Peace will only come when nations are willing to share and share equitably, the rich to help the poor and the strong to help the weak, thus creating international goodwill. Only if and when these conditions are met, can we envision a world with no excuse for wars.

    The madness of the armaments race must stop! We must try to build schools instead of cruisers, hospitals instead of nuclear weapons. The amount of money and human lives that various governments waste in the battlefield should be diverted to build up the economics to elevate the standard of living.

    The world cannot have peace until men and nations renounce selfish desires, give up racial arrogance, and eradicate egoistic lust for possession and power. Wealth cannot secure happiness. Religion alone can effect the necessary change of heart and bring about the only real disarmament – that of the mind.

    All religions teach people not to kill; but unfortunately this important precept is conveniently ignored. Today, with modern armaments, man can kill millions within one second, that is, more than primitive tribes did in a century.

    Very unfortunately some people in certain countries bring religious labels, slogans and banners into their battlefields. They do not know that they are disgracing the good name of religion.

    ‘Verily, O monk,’ said the Buddha, ‘due to sensuous craving, kings fight with kings, princes with princes, priests with priests, citizens with citizens, the mother quarrels with the son, the son quarrels with the father, brother with brother, brother with sister, sister with brother, friend with friend’. (Majjhima Nikaya)

    We can happily say that for the last 2,500 years there has never been any serious discord or conflict created by Buddhists that led to war in the name of this religion. This is a result of the dynamic character of the concept of tolerance contained in the Buddha’s teaching.

    STUDY ABOUT BUDDHISM PROPERLY BEFORE MAKE THIS TYPE OF COMPAIRS AS WE BUDDHISTS NEVR DO SUCH THINGS TO YOUR OR ANYONE’S RELIGION!

  5. 5 demithri April 24, 2010 at 10:19 am

    ***The Instruction to the Kalamas by Lord Buddha***

    The Kalamas of Kesaputta go to see the Buddha

    1. I heard thus. Once the Blessed One, while wandering in the Kosala country with a large community of bhikkhus, entered a town of the Kalama people called Kesaputta. The Kalamas who were inhabitants of Kesaputta: “Reverend Gotama, the monk, the son of the Sakiyans, has, while wandering in the Kosala country, entered Kesaputta. The good repute of the Reverend Gotama has been spread in this way: Indeed, the Blessed One is thus consummate, fully enlightened, endowed with knowledge and practice, sublime, knower of the worlds, peerless, guide of tamable men, teacher of divine and human beings, which he by himself has through direct knowledge understood clearly. He set forth the Dhamma, good in the beginning, good in the middle, good in the end, possessed of meaning and the letter, and complete in everything; and he proclaims the holy life that is perfectly pure. Seeing such consummate ones is good indeed.”

    2. Then the Kalamas who were inhabitants of Kesaputta went to where the Blessed One was. On arriving there some paid homage to him and sat down on one side; some exchanged greetings with him and after the ending of cordial memorable talk, sat down on one side; some saluted him raising their joined palms and sat down on one side; some announced their name and family and sat down on one side; some without speaking, sat down on one side.

    The Kalamas of Kesaputta ask for guidance from the Buddha

    3. The Kalamas who were inhabitants of Kesaputta sitting on one side said to the Blessed One: “There are some monks and brahmins, venerable sir, who visit Kesaputta. They expound and explain only their own doctrines; the doctrines of others they despise, revile, and pull to pieces. Some other monks and brahmins too, venerable sir, come to Kesaputta. They also expound and explain only their own doctrines; the doctrines of others they despise, revile, and pull to pieces. Venerable sir, there is doubt, there is uncertainty in us concerning them. Which of these reverend monks and brahmins spoke the truth and which falsehood?”

    The criterion for rejection

    4. “It is proper for you, Kalamas, to doubt, to be uncertain;uncertainty has arisen in you about what is doubtful. Come, Kalamas. Do not go upon what has been acquired by repeated hearing; nor upon tradition; nor upon rumor; nor upon what is in a scripture; nor upon surmise; nor upon an axiom; nor upon specious reasoning; nor upon a bias towards a notion that has been pondered over; nor upon another’s seeming ability; nor upon the consideration, ‘The monk is our teacher.’ Kalamas, when you yourselves know: ‘These things are bad; these things are blamable; these things are censured by the wise; undertaken and observed, these things lead to harm and ill,’ abandon them.

    Greed, hate, and delusion

    5. “What do you think, Kalamas? Does greed appear in a man for his benefit or harm?” – “For his harm, venerable sir.” – “Kalamas, being given to greed, and being overwhelmed and vanquished mentally by greed, this man takes life, steals, commits adultery, and tells lies; he prompts another too, to do likewise. Will that be long for his harm and ill?” – “Yes, venerable sir.”

    6. “What do you think, Kalamas? Does hate appear in a man for his benefit or harm?” – “For his harm, venerable sir.” – “Kalamas, being given to hate, and being overwhelmed and vanquished mentally by hate, this man takes life, steals, commits adultery, and tells lies; he prompts another too, to do likewise. Will that be long for his harm and ill?” – “Yes, venerable sir.”

    7. “What do you think, Kalamas? Does delusion appear in a man for his benefit or harm?” – “For his harm, venerable sir.” – “Kalamas, being given to delusion, and being overwhelmed and vanquished mentally by delusion, this man takes life, steals, commits adultery, and tells lies; he prompts another too, to do likewise. Will that be long for his harm and ill?” – “Yes, venerable sir.”

    8. “What do you think, Kalamas? Are these things good or bad?” – “Bad, venerable sir” – “Blamable or not blamable?” – “Blamable, venerable sir.” – “Censured or praised by the wise?” – “Censured, venerable sir.” – “Undertaken and observed, do these things lead to harm and ill, or not? Or how does it strike you?” – “Undertaken and observed, these things lead to harm and ill. Thus it strikes us here.”

    9. “Therefore, did we say, Kalamas, what was said thus, ‘Come Kalamas. Do not go upon what has been acquired by repeated hearing; nor upon tradition; nor upon rumor; nor upon what is in a scripture; nor upon surmise; nor upon an axiom; nor upon specious reasoning; nor upon a bias towards a notion that has been pondered over; nor upon another’s seeming ability; nor upon the consideration, “The monk is our teacher.” Kalamas, when you yourselves know: “These things are bad; these things are blamable; these things are censured by the wise; undertaken and observed, these things lead to harm and ill,” abandon them.’

    The criterion for acceptance

    10. “Come, Kalamas. Do not go upon what has been acquired by repeated hearing; nor upon tradition; nor upon rumor; nor upon what is in a scripture; nor upon surmise; nor upon an axiom; nor upon specious reasoning; nor upon a bias towards a notion that has been pondered over; nor upon another’s seeming ability; nor upon the consideration, ‘The monk is our teacher.’ Kalamas, when you yourselves know: ‘These things are good; these things are not blamable; these things are praised by the wise; undertaken and observed, these things lead to benefit and happiness,’ enter on and abide in them.

    Absence of greed, hate, and delusion

    11, “What do you think, Kalamas? Does absence of greed appear in a man for his benefit or harm?” – “For his benefit, venerable sir.” – “Kalamas, being not given to greed, and being not overwhelmed and not vanquished mentally by greed, this man does not take life, does not steal, does not commitadultery, and does not tell lies; he prompts another too, to do likewise. Will that be long for his benefit and happiness?” – “Yes, venerable sir.”

    12. “What do you think, Kalamas? Does absence of hate appear in a man for his benefit or harm?” – “For his benefit, venerable sir.” – “Kalamas, being not given to hate, and being not overwhelmed and not vanquished mentally by hate, this man does not take life, does not steal, does not commit adultery, and does not tell lies; he prompts another too, to do likewise. Will that be long for his benefit and happiness?” – “Yes, venerable sir.”

    13. “What do you think, Kalamas? Does absence of delusion appear in a man for his benefit or harm?” – “For his benefit, venerable sir.” – “Kalamas, being not given to delusion, and being not overwhelmed and not vanquished mentally by delusion, this man does not take life, does not steal, does not commit adultery, and does not tell lies; he prompts another too, to do likewise. Will that be long for his benefit and happiness?” – “Yes, venerable sir.”

    14. “What do you think, Kalamas? Are these things good or bad?” – “Good, venerable sir.” – “Blamable or not blamable?” – “Not blamable, venerable sir.” – “Censured or praised by the wise?” – “Praised, venerable sir.” – “Undertaken and observed, do these things lead to benefit and happiness, or not? Or how does it strike you?” – “Undertaken and observed, these things lead to benefit and happiness. Thus it strikes us here.”

    15. “Therefore, did we say, Kalamas, what was said thus, ‘Come Kalamas. Do not go upon what has been acquired by repeated hearing; nor upon tradition; nor upon rumor; nor upon what is in a scripture; nor upon surmise; nor upon an axiom; nor upon specious reasoning; nor upon a bias towards a notion that has been pondered over; nor upon another’s seeming ability; nor upon the consideration, “The monk is our teacher.” Kalamas, when you yourselves know: “These things are bad; these things are blamable; these things are censured by the wise; undertaken and observed, these things lead to harm and ill,” abandon them.’

    The Four Exalted Dwellings

    16. “The disciple of the Noble Ones, Kalamas, who in this way is devoid of coveting, devoid of ill will, undeluded, clearly comprehending and mindful, dwells, having pervaded, with the thought of amity, one quarter; likewise the second; likewise the third; likewise the fourth; so above, below, and across; he dwells, having pervaded because of the existence in it of all living beings, everywhere, the entire world, with the great, exalted, boundless thought of amity that is free of hate or malice.

    “He lives, having pervaded, with the thought of compassion, one quarter; likewise the second; likewise the third; likewise the fourth; so above, below, and across; he dwells, having pervaded because of the existence in it of all living beings, everywhere, the entire world, with the great, exalted, boundless thought of compassion that is free of hate or malice.

    “He lives, having pervaded, with the thought of gladness, one quarter; likewise the second; likewise the third; likewise the fourth; so above, below, and across; he dwells, having pervaded because of the existence in it of all living beings, everywhere, the entire world, with the great, exalted, boundless thought of gladness that is free of hate or malice.

    “He lives, having pervaded, with the thought of equanimity, one quarter; likewise the second; likewise the third; likewise the fourth; so above, below, and across; he dwells, having pervaded because of the existence in it of all living beings, everywhere, the entire world, with the great, exalted, boundless thought of equanimity that is free of hate or malice.

    The Four Solaces

    17. “The disciple of the Noble Ones, Kalamas, who has such a hate-free mind, such a malice-free mind, such an undefiled mind, and such a purified mind, is one by whom four solaces are found here and now.

    “‘Suppose there is a hereafter and there is a fruit, result, of deeds done well or ill. Then it is possible that at the dissolution of the body after death, I shall arise in the heavenly world, which is possessed of the state of bliss.’ This is the first solace found by him.

    “‘Suppose there is no hereafter and there is no fruit, no result, of deeds done well or ill. Yet in this world, here and now, free from hatred, free from malice, safe and sound, and happy, I keep myself.’ This is the second solace found by him.

    “‘Suppose evil (results) befall an evil-doer. I, however, think of doing evil to no one. Then, how can ill (results) affect me who do no evil deed?’ This is the third solace found by him.

    “‘Suppose evil (results) do not befall an evil-doer. Then I see myself purified in any case.’ This is the fourth solace found by him.

    “The disciple of the Noble Ones, Kalamas, who has such a hate-free mind, such a malice-free mind, such an undefiled mind, and such a purified mind, is one by whom, here and now, these four solaces are found.”

    “So it is, Blessed One. So it is, Sublime one. The disciple of the Noble Ones, venerable sir, who has such a hate-free mind, such a malice-free mind, such an undefiled mind, and such a purified mind, is one by whom, here and now, four solaces are found.

    “‘Suppose there is no hereafter and there is no fruit, no result, of deeds done well or ill. Yet in this world, here and now, free from hatred, free from malice, safe and sound, and happy, I keep myself.’ This is the second solace found by him.

    “‘Suppose evil (results) befall an evil-doer. I, however, think of doing evil to no one. Then, how can ill (results) affect me who do no evil deed?’ This is the third solace found by him.

    “‘Suppose evil (results) do not befall an evil-doer. Then I see myself purified in any case.’ This is the fourth solace found by him.

    “The disciple of the Noble Ones, venerable sir, who has such a hate-free mind, such a malice-free mind, such an undefiled mind, and such a purified mind, is one by whom, here and now, these four solaces are found.”

    “Marvelous, venerable sir! Marvelous, venerable sir! As if, venerable sir, a person were to turn face upwards what is upside down, or to uncover the concealed, or to point the way to one who is lost or to carry a lamp in the darkness, thinking, ‘Those who have eyes will see visible objects,’ so has the Dhamma been set forth in many ways by the Blessed One. We, venerable sir, go to the Blessed One for refuge, to the Dhamma for refuge, and to the Community of Bhikkhus for refuge. Venerable sir, may the Blessed One regard us as lay followers who have gone for refuge for life, from today.”

    Anguttara Nikaya, Tika Nipata

    ***The Unification of Faith (s. sraddha) and Wisdom (s. prajna)

    People are of varying natures and types and thus have different temperaments, worries, demands and passions. In general, one who has stronger feeling and sentiment is more likely to be compassionate and is more capable of developing strong faith in one’s belief; while an intellectual person tends to have greater powers of discernment and lucid comprehension. The biased development of either faith or intellect results in protracted, cumulative, negative and harmful effects. For example, if an emotional person has strong faith without counter-balancing wisdom, he may sink into ignorance and superstition due to his fanatical faith. The lop-sided attitude of discriminating against rationality and wisdom is not acceptable in Buddhism. On the other hand, if we over-emphasize rationality and doubting everything, we will lose our faith and belief. This induces us to ignore moral values and to deny the existence of Universal Truth, saints and sages. One would thereby finally become anti-religious. Such perversity would lead us astray and prevent us from establishing truly moral behavior, eventually threatening the very fabric of our society! Thus, there is a saying in Buddhism,

    “Faith without wisdom will develop ignorance;
    wisdom without faith will develop a perverted view.”

    Buddhism advocates the unification of faith and wisdom. How can we bring faith and wisdom together? Is it possible to unify them? In the first place, we need to understand the Buddhist perspective of faith and wisdom. Faith is characterized by the sentiments of respect and of inspiration by an ideal. Faith is a common experience amongst the followers of any religion. Faith without intellectual comprehension and discrimination cannot be regarded as a rational faith. Faith in Buddhism is developed through contemplation and investigation so that the characteristics of truthfulness, righteousness, and efficacy of the ideal in which one develops faith, can be understood and revealed. This is the way a Buddhist develops faith and respect toward Sakyamuni Buddha. Sakyamuni is understood rationally to have existed in this world as a historical figure. He has supreme wisdom and great virtues and he has boundless compassion working towards the liberation of sentient beings. In Buddhism, faith is rooted in rational intellectual comprehension. As faith is strengthened and sharpened by the assessment of the intellect, it is further confirmed by the direct insight of wisdom. When understanding of the Buddha Dharma is developed further, faith becomes more intense. This faith will motivate us to elevate ourselves and ground our lives in true morality. It will enable our lives, guided by the ideals to which we have responded with faith. Faith is not merely an appreciation of the ideal but a desire to move towards it.

    Although some intellectuals possess a vast knowledge of Buddhism, and have strong reasoning ability, they commonly lack faith in Buddhism. Therefore, Dharma can not take firm root and grow in their hearts. Because of this, Dharma cannot really benefit them. Studying Buddhism in this barren manner contradicts the teaching of Buddhism because the Buddhist way of life necessarily contains the element of faith. When we have confidence, we will be able to purify our minds and free them from defilements i.e. greed (s. raga), hatred (s. pratigha) and ego-conceptualization (s. atmamana). Confidence is like an alum; it purifies muddy water. Similarly, a strong faith will purify your mind. The reality of life is full of distress and misery, but faith can transform a mental state of emptiness and anguish into joy, peace, calm and contentment. This is like an innocent child who wanders around the streets, lost, hungry, thirsty, cold, worried and not knowing what to do. While he is anxious and filled with despair, he suddenly finds his mother. He will immediately feel secure and happy because he deeply believes that he will obtain food, warm clothes and the consolation of his mother’s love. Similarly, a life of faith is filled with joy, peace, security and contentment.

    If our faith is not developed through open thinking and reasoning, then we are just following what others lead us to believe. A blind religious faith becomes fanatical when it is carried away by wild enthusiasm and the deprecation of wisdom. Buddhist faith develops through the cultivation of wisdom. Since it espouses a faith wedded to wisdom, Buddhism avoids the viciousness of that religious fanaticism which espouses faith devoid of deeper understanding and divorced from wisdom. The development of Buddhist faith involves several stages. The evolving faith displayed by some Buddhists does not therefore necessarily reveal the true, ultimate meaning of faith in the Buddha Dharma.

    The most outstanding characteristic of wisdom is free thought and its operative functions include understanding and cognition. The wisdom of humanity extends through space to the farthest reaches of the Universe. Our knowledge is continuously changing, improving and progressing. Therefore traditions may not necessarily be reliable. This is due to the fact that when humans develop knowledge acquired through their own perceptions of the external world, much unreliable information is accumulated in the process. Such empirical knowledge is vitiated because the pieces of information from which it is derived are in turn derived from sensory perceptions of the external world, and both the ordinary mind and the external world are comprised of, and compromised by, a certain degree of illusion. For example, when we are perceiving the external world we cannot know our minds at the same moment. Therefore, we are tempted by the external world and our minds are controlled by the material world. Since we lose control of our minds, greed, hatred and ignorance arise. In Buddhism it is acknowledged that the knowledge gained by human beings is far superior to that gained by other beings. We humans almost try to know everything, yet we do not know ourselves. This is a cognitive bias of ours. When we try to understand the external world we lack the ability to have a complete overview of it. Everything in the phenomenal world is impermanent and constantly changing, but we are always subjectively inferring about the nature of objects that this is their absolute existence and that they will be as they are forever. As a result, human knowledge generally harbors many illusions.

    Some people think that Truth lies outside the mind, and they therefore seek it in the external world. Others consider that there is an external metaphysical entity which properly serves as their religious ideal, and the focus of their faith. In fact, all the external worlds are like mirages, unreal and constantly changing. The wisdom which Buddhism teaches starts with self-contemplation and an experience of insight. Truth cannot be simplistically derived from observation of the external world. Rather, Truth requires us to understand ourselves and to grasp our inner nature. Just as a person who has sharp senses and a bright and discerning mind does not need to seek help from others in order to clearly comprehend Truth, we should develop from the inside out so that we can project this luminous understanding and contemplation of ourselves into the dimness of the external world. This is the only way to unify wisdom and faith.

    In fact, wisdom and faith are not really in opposition to one another. Conflict will only arise if we practice prejudice against either wisdom or faith. Wisdom without faith is biased towards that which is material. This positivistic emphasis is inimical to religion. Faith without wisdom is biased towards a sentimental faith which is inimical to reason. Buddha Dharma is a unification of wisdom and faith; a faith which is grounded in wisdom, and a wisdom which emphasizes human life and self-effort. Faith is thereby kept away from illusion. Wisdom and faith are mutually grounded. If we can understand, experience and practice this path, life will be filled with infinite brightness and cheer.

    The Cultivation of Faith and Wisdom

    The cultivation of faith involves several stages. Although the depth of practice involved in each stage is different, the common purpose of all the various stages is ultimately the unification of faith and wisdom. These stages include:

    1. Faith without prejudice — This is faith based on understanding devoid of any prejudice. Such an open faith is important because if one has a prejudiced mind it will make it difficult to understand others’ views, or to accept the Truth. For a simple example, suppose A and B did not get along well. If B makes some mistakes and A then gives B some honest advice, not only will B reject A’s advice but he will further misconstrue it as malicious slander against him. Conversely, if A and B do not have any prejudice against each other, or if their relationship is very close, B will be willing to follow any of A’s advice even if A uses strong language in expressing it to him. Therefore, one can only learn and have faith in the Truth if one first frees oneself from prejudice. This is the way to develop and to purify confidence and faith. (This is consistent with the first of the three ways that Buddhism teaches that one may acquire wisdom i.e. by listening and learning (s. srutamayiprajna).)

    2. Faith with profound understanding — After establishing faith without prejudice, one is required to develop a profound understanding of the valid grounds for faith, and by such reasonable means to acknowledge its authenticity. The deeper the understanding of the valid grounds for faith, the stronger the faith that will arise. The valid grounds for faith are learnt and authenticated by listening, by seeing, and deepened by incisive thought in order to gain a systematic understanding. (This correlates with Buddhist teaching on the second of the three ways to acquire wisdom i.e. by thinking (s. cintamayi-prajna).)

    3. Faith with endeavor — After exercising one’s reasoning and coming to understand the grounds for faith, one will make every endeavor to achieve it. The process is analogous to oil mining. One must first examine the ground and be very certain that petroleum can be found under a certain spot. One then starts to drill an oil-well at that spot, persevering until its riches are brought to the surface. (This corresponds to the third of the three ways to acquire wisdom i.e. by meditation and contemplation (s. bhavanamayi-prajna).)

    4. Faith with realization — By continuous practice and contemplation, one comes to realize that there is no difference between the ultimate truth and what one believes in beginning. It is like a miner who procures a large quantity of petroleum by virtue of his effort in drilling oil wells. (This corresponds to the realization of prajna.)

    In Buddhism, faith is not antagonistic towards wisdom, and conversely wisdom is accomplished only in consort with faith and confidence. The ultimate achievement is the unification of wisdom and faith. The meaning of faith in Buddhism is thus very different from its meaning in other religions.

    Wisdom in Buddhism is attained through the mental culture of self-contemplation. Since the main issue in the accumulation of true knowledge is the quest to learn all about human nature, we can consequently understand the Truth only by understanding our lives and by grasping the wisdom of life. We may then clearly contemplate the Universe and the phenomenal world, thereafter being able to penetrate to the Truth. If one believes that wisdom is to be gained through the external world, one can only arrive at a superficial knowledge of the Truth and cannot dwell in the heart of Dharma.

    In Buddhism, the cultivation of wisdom does not hinder faith. For example, through His own exertions the Buddha realized that there are infinite number of different planes of existence, and that the ranks of sentient beings are likewise limitless. When science is not well developed, people always doubt this. But in these modern times, by using scientific instruments, we can prove that there are indeed an infinite number of planets in this universe. As science further develops, it may become even easier to prove the correctness of the teachings of Buddha, which of course will help further reinforce faith. On the other hand, the cultivation of faith does not hinder wisdom either. We have faith in the teachings of the Buddha, and at the same time we can easily be learning the reality of such profound teachings as dependent origination, impermanence, non-self etc., and experiencing the application of these Buddhist teachings in our daily lives. The teaching of the unification of wisdom and faith is a distinctive characteristic and an emphatic feature of Buddhism. When we make a relevant comparison with other religions we can see that in this regard Buddhism is unique.

    The Union of Compassion and Wisdom

    A common saying in Buddhism, “to develop and practise both compassion and wisdom,” indicates that compassion and wisdom are inseparable and integral elements of the path of Buddha Dharma. The contents and functions of ‘loving kindness and compassion’ are similar to those of ‘benevolence’ in Chinese thought, and of ‘love’ in Western philosophy. However, loving kindness and compassion do not entirely and exclusively consist of sympathy and caring. They must also move in parallel with the Truth. Therefore, boundless compassion cannot be accomplished without wisdom. Moralities originate from loving kindness and compassion and they cannot be established without these two elements. Their presence constitutes the main criterion for moral evaluation. Whether or not an action is truly ethical depends on whether there are elements of loving kindness and compassion present amongst the actor’s motives.

    Compassion is having sympathy for someone. For example, when we know that someone is facing difficulties, the feelings of care and concern for them will arise naturally. This will help motivate us to make every effort to assist and to comfort them. This is the practice of loving kindness and compassion. However, most of us only direct our loving kindness and compassion toward our loved ones, but do not extend loving kindness and compassion to other beings lying outside the circle of our affections. For instance, parents are normally very worried and anxious when their children are sick, and they are willing to suffer for their children. For most of us, this loving kindness and compassion is directed only to our own children and cannot be extended to the children of others. This is due to the fact that our love is reserved for a small number of people and does not go beyond this limitation. There is a saying in Confucianism,

    “to take care of one’s own aged parents first,
    then extend the same care to aged people in general;
    to take care of one’s own young children,
    then extend the same care to young people in general.”

    Buddha teaches us to cultivate perfect equanimity as the rightly mediate state of mind in which we can further develop and extend our loving kindness and compassion.

  6. 6 sampuna November 25, 2010 at 2:28 pm

    you’ve got some errors there. Buddhism as you see it,is just one-sided.

    Please do explore Buddhism deeper.There are two main paths of practising Buddhism, either being in the higher monastic path whereby spiritual training is at its best, or if one still wants to enjoy the senses,one can still practise a worthy religious life that would result in a better rebirth.That path is called the layman’s path.

    Buddhism has been unfairly presented by you,I assume through ignorence.Yes, monastism, the system of monkhood & nunhood focuses a lot on simple living, making do with little belongings & living on others’ charity.

    The Buddhist layman,as per Buddha’s teaching are taught to be generous too.Please read Sigalovada Sutta.

  7. 7 Saliya Suranimala June 8, 2011 at 2:39 am

    Dougrogers is not completely correct in his explanation about the Buddhist view on the Universe. In Anamatagga Sutta (Majjima Nikaya-Sutta Pitaka) Buddha very clearly states that the Universe has no beginning, it is very difficult to comprehend. Modern Science tells us that the Universe has a beginning. You may refer to Laws of Thermodynamics. In Agganna Sutta (Deega Nikaya-Sutta Pitaka) Buddha explains that the first human beings appear from Abassara Brahma Loka on the face of the earth. Sun and Moon appear very much after the arrival of the first human beings. I wonder anyone in the 21st century has the intellectual bravery to digest and accept such fairy tales.

    Suranimala

  8. 8 merril October 16, 2012 at 5:15 pm

    buddhism neither here no their religion from the beginning.Lord buddha said can consume meat when the animal or bird is not killed specifically for that person ‘ so he ate meat when offered (perhaps he new it was not killed for him- he was more intelligent than todays buddhists)
    to day 99.9% of animals slaughtered or killed are done in butcheries and in the name of any individuals so the buddhist should eat any meat without any restrictions
    some countries practice theravada buddhism and they say they observe vegetarianism as per their religious commands.and almost even go to the extent of worshipping the cow but there are other theravada buddhist countries where they not only eat raw flesh of cow they even drink t from raw gallbladder.
    then there are the mahayana buddhists who would even consume monkey brains raw.


Leave a comment




November 2009
M T W T F S S
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30  

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 119 other subscribers

Blog Stats

  • 199,731 hits